INTRODUCTION
Cigarette smoking is a well-known major cause of various chronic diseases, including cancer and cardiovascular and lung diseases [
1,
2]. Annually, >7 million people die of tobacco related-diseases worldwide [
1]. In Korea, approximately 58,000 people experience premature death related to smoking each year [
2]. Reducing the smoking prevalence could help reduce the national health-care spending and prevent individual health problems. Many countries have taken great efforts to reduce the prevalence of smoking. Korea has also been taking great efforts to implement the policy of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, an international tobacco control policy. For example, tobacco prices were increased in January 2015. Previous studies have shown that higher tobacco prices enhance a person’s motivation to quit smoking [
3].
The prevalence of smoking in Korea has decreased after the implementation of the tobacco price policy, and studies have found that the increase in tobacco prices has led to the reduction of smoking rates [
4]. However, no study has examined the changes in the stages of smoking cessation among smokers after the tobacco price increase in Korea. According to the transtheoretical model proposed by DiClemente et al. [
5], the process of smoking cessation consists of five steps: precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance [
6]. During the first three steps, a smoker considers quitting smoking in the future. Studies have shown that the quit rates are 2 times higher when smokers transition from the precontemplation to the contemplation stage [
7,
8]. We hypothesized that an increase in tobacco prices will have a positive effect on a smoker’s position within the five stages of smoking cessation, even if it may not result in a successful smoking cessation.
By using the transtheoretical model as the theoretical framework of this study, we aimed to examine the changes in the readiness to quit among smokers before and after the implementation of the tobacco price policy, and to identify related factors that may contribute to being in the precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages. To address these objectives, we used nationwide data that had been collected as part of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Therefore, the present findings are expected to clarify whether an increase in tobacco prices is effective in changing the stages of smoking cessation among Korean adult (age ≥19 years) male smokers.
METHODS
1. Study Population
In this study, we analyzed integrated data that were collected as part of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2012, 2013, 2015, and 2016. The plan to increase tobacco prices from 2,500 won to 4,500 won from January 1, 2015, was announced during the second half of 2014. As this event was expected to confound the results, the data of the participants of the 2014 survey were excluded. Before examining the changes in smoking rates and the percentage of participants who belonged to each stage of smoking cessation before and after the increase in tobacco prices in 2015, we aimed to delineate the trends that underlie smoking rates and the stages of smoking cessation within the last 10 years. For this purpose, data that were collected as a part of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2008 and 2017 were additionally obtained. The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey uses complex stratified sampling to collect representative data of the sociodemographic characteristics, health status, and related behaviors (including smoking) of Koreans. Of a total of 10,710 Korean male adults (age ≥19 years) who were surveyed, 3,533 were current smokers at the time of the survey and analyzed as participants of this study.
2. Smoking Status and Smoking Cessation Stages
Health interview data were analyzed. Self-report measures were used, and face-to-face interviews were conducted by well-trained health interviewers. During these health interviews, the following details were collected: household characteristics, smoking status, alcohol use, mental health status, educational level, and socioeconomic status. Some of these variables were redefined in accordance with the aims of this study.
Current smokers were defined as persons who had smoked ≥100 cigarettes during their lifetime and were continuing to smoke at the time of the survey. They were divided into two groups to compare the general characteristics of smokers, namely before (2012 and 2013; n=1,778) and after (2015 and 2016; n=1,755) the policy-driven increase in tobacco prices. The process of smoking cessation consists of five stages: precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance [
5,
6]. A respondent who answered “no” to the question “Are you planning to quit smoking within the next 6 months?” was considered to belong to the precontemplation stage; this indicated that the respondent had not considered quitting smoking. A respondent who answered “yes” to the question “Are you planning to quit smoking within the next 1 month?” was considered to belong to the preparation stage; this indicated that the respondent had been preparing to quit smoking within the next 1 month. Smokers who were in the contemplation stage were those who were planning to quit smoking not within the next 1 month but within the next 6 months. For analytic purposes, we divided the participants into two groups based on the stage of smoking cessation to which they belonged: those who intended to quit smoking (contemplation or preparation) and those who had never considered smoking cessation (precontemplation).
The effect of the implementation of the tobacco price policy on the stages of smoking cessation was examined in relation to the following variables: age (in years), marital status (living with a spouse or living alone), area of residence (rural or urban), individual income (lowest or higher quartile), educational level (<9 years of education or higher education), occupational status (nonmanual or manual worker), number of cigarettes smoked per day (more than one pack of cigarettes per day: yes or no), heavy drinking (yes or no), comorbidities (i.e., hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, angina, myocardial infarction, or stroke diagnosed by a doctor), subjective health status (poor or good), stress level (high or low), and pulmonary function (abnormal or normal).
With respect to the definition of areas of residence, Seoul, Gyeonggi, and six major metropolitan cities were classified as urban areas. Eight provinces including Jeju were classified as rural areas. Farmers, fishermen, craft and related-trade workers, plant and machine operators and assemblers, elementary occupation workers or armed forces personnel, housewives, students, and unemployed individuals were classified as “manual workers or unemployed.” Managers, professionals, clerical support workers, and service and sales workers were classified as “nonmanual workers.” Heavy drinking was defined as the consumption of more than seven glasses of alcohol per day. Stress level was assessed using the following question: “Do you experience a lot of stress in your daily life?” The response options were “extremely stressed,” “quite,” “a little,” and “not at all stressed.” If a participant chose the “extremely stressed” or “quite” options, he was considered to have high levels of stress. Subjective health status was assessed using the following question: “Do you think you are healthy?” The response options were “very good,” “good,” “fair,” “poor,” and “very poor.” Those who chose the “poor” and “very poor” response options were considered to have poor subjective health.
A dry rolling-seal spirometer (model 2130; SensorMedics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) was used to assess pulmonary function. The forced expiratory volume in 1second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were used to diagnose obstructive and restrictive disorders. An obstructive pattern was defined FEV1/FVC <0.70. A restrictive pattern was defined as FEV1/FVC ≥0.70 and FVC <80% of the predicted value. Normal lung function was defined as FEV1/FVC ≥0.70 and FVC ≥80% of the predicted value. Participants with obstructive and restrictive patterns were classified as “abnormal.
3. Statistical Analysis
Statistical weights were applied to account for the complex survey design of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which adopts the proportional distribution method. The prevalence of smoking among adult men (age ≥19 years) who participated in the assessment of smoking characteristics was ascertained. The percentage of current smokers in each smoking cessation stage was calculated. The general characteristics of current smokers before and after the increase in tobacco prices were compared. Continuous variables were analyzed using the t-test, and presented as means and standard errors. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test, and presented as estimated percentages and standard errors. Crude (model 1) and multiple (model 2) logistic regression models were analyzed after adjusting for the following potential confounders: age [
9-
11], area of residence, individual income [
10,
12], occupation [
13,
14], education [
10,
12], comorbidity, subjective health status, and stress level. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to examine the associations between different factors and changes in the smoking cessation stage (precontemplation versus contemplation or preparation). The number of cigarettes smoked per day was excluded from the analysis because it was also believed to have been affected by the increase in tobacco prices. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Complex Samples ver. 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results were considered statistically significant if the P-value was <0.05. All participants of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provided written informed consent. The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey can be conducted without the approval of a research ethics committee because it is a public repository survey aiming to enhance public welfare. This survey is conducted by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare.
DISCUSSION
This study was conducted to examine the changes in the stages of smoking cessation among Korean male current smokers before and after the implementation of the tobacco price policy in 2015. We identified related factors that may have contributed to changes in the smoking cessation stages using nationwide data collected as part of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
During the last 10 years, the prevalence of smoking among Korean adult men (age ≥19 years) has continued to decrease as a result of the implementation of various smoking cessation policies. In 2015, when the tobacco prices were increased, the prevalence of smoking was reported to be <40% for the first time in history of the smoking rate survey. At this time, a noticeable 4% decrease in smoking rate was observed, which was more pronounced than the previously reported average reduction rate (1.5%) (
Figure 1). Previous studies have shown that an increase in tobacco prices has a positive effect on the prevalence of smoking [
3,
4,
15]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has estimated that a 10% increase in tobacco prices will reduce the overall tobacco consumption by 3% to 5% [
16]. The Korean government had reported that the 80% increase in cigarette prices from 2,500 won to 4,500 won reduced the sale of cigarettes by 15.5% in 2015. By comparing the number of cigarettes consumed per day before and after the implementation of the tobacco price policy, we were also able to demonstrate that the percentage of smokers who smoked more than one pack per day decreased from 42.5% to 34.4%. This suggests that, even if an increase in tobacco prices does not increase quit rates, it has a positive effect on smoking behaviors.
The process of smoking cessation consists of five stages: precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. As smokers advance through each stage, their likelihood of quitting smoking within 6 months increases by more than twofold [
7,
8]. When compared with 2012 and 2013, the percentage of smokers who were in the contemplation and preparation stages in 2015 and 2016 had increased from 34.4% to 39.2%. However, as can be inferred from
Figure 1, the percentage of participants in the contemplation and preparation stages had peaked in 2015 but sharply declined and returned to the prior levels thereafter. More than 50% of the current smokers did not plan to quit smoking despite the implementation of the tobacco price policy. The effect of an increase in tobacco prices on the stage of smoking cessation seems to be temporary. The consistently high percentage of participants in the precontemplation stage may be attributable to the decrease in the total number of smokers. The prevalence of smoking has been decreasing during the past 10 years. The total number of smokers, which served as the denominator, had decreased over time and susceptible smokers had quit smoking. In contrast, the numerator represented the total number of smokers who were unable to quit smoking. Therefore, the percentage of participants in the precontemplation stage may have remained unchanged. Therefore, a tobacco price policy should be designed considering changes in the inflation rate and must be continuously implemented to effectively reduce the prevalence of smoking.
In the present study, age (1-year increase), income (lowest quartile), and occupational status (manual workers and unemployed individuals) were predictors of belonging to the group of smokers in the precontemplation stage (those with no intention to quit smoking) [
9,
11,
17]. Jhun and Seo [
18] found that smokers with a longer smoking duration are more likely to remain in the precontemplation stage. Researchers have contended that the smoking duration proportionally increases with age. Older smokers may have had several opportunities to quit smoking but have continued to smoke. As smokers grow older, they might have the belief that quitting at their present age would not be substantially beneficial to their health. Our findings suggest the need for efforts to enhance the motivation to quit smoking among older smokers who are unemployed and earning a low income. These results were also consistent with previous findings suggesting that manual workers have high rates of smoking and low rates of quitting [
13,
14]. Manual workers face lower levels of social pressure and receive lower levels of social support to quit smoking from their job environments when compared with nonmanual workers [
14]. Although restrictions on smoking in indoor workplaces have been reinforced in recent times, smoking at outdoor industrial sites is still widely tolerated and considered to provide a short break from work, which could also explain the high smoking rates among manual workers.
Other studies have found that socioeconomic factors affect a person’s stage of smoking cessation [
10,
12,
18]. In one study, socioeconomic status and change in the smoking cessation stage were found to be more relevant to male smokers than to female smokers [
18]. Another study reported that smokers with a higher educational level and income were more likely to consider quitting smoking within the next 6 months [
12]. Most studies have consistently reported similar results [
10,
13,
18]. However, in one study conducted in China, income was not significantly related to smoking cessation [
19]. The researchers attributed this finding to the rapid economic growth in China. Specifically, they reported that the rate of increase in household income was more than 3 times greater than that in cigarette consumption [
19]. We assumed that smokers whose incomes fall within the lower quartile would have been more likely to have considered quitting smoking after the increase in tobacco prices, owing to the excessive financial burden. However, this group of smokers are also more likely to continue not thinking about quitting smoking because it has been demonstrated that smokers with a lower socioeconomic status are more likely to live in the present and less likely to think about the future [
20]. In one study, smoking cessation education through media campaigns was found to be ineffective among socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers [
21]. The factors that were found to be associated with remaining in the precontemplation stage in this study were similar to those that have been identified in previous studies that did not examine the effect of increases in tobacco price. However, we found that, among those who had not changed their minds about smoking cessation, there was no change in the smoking cessation stage despite the increase in cigarette prices. The univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the increase in cigarette prices had a significant influence on the stage of smoking cessation; however, this effect was not significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis. We speculated that, when compared with an intrinsic motivation to quit smoking, tobacco price increase may have only a limited effect. Moreover, smoking cessation may be influenced by a combination of various socioeconomic and institutional factors.
This study had several limitations. First, because the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey had adopted a cross-sectional research design, causal relationships could not be examined. Data were collected from different groups of participants in each survey. Nevertheless, we were able to enhance the representativeness of the sample and the accuracy of the data by applying weights to the nationwide sample. Second, smoking duration and nicotine dependence, which are important factors that affect smoking cessation, were not assessed. Further, we could not examine the effects of other tobacco control policies (e.g., expansion of nonsmoking areas, regulations on tobacco advertisements) on smoking cessation. Despite these limitations, this study is the first to examine the changes in smoking cessation stages before and after the implementation of the tobacco price policy among Korean male adult smokers. The study findings offer valuable insights into the effects of the policy implementation, although it was not effective in promoting complete smoking cessation.
In conclusion, the tobacco price policy had some positive impact on the stages of smoking cessation, whereby a transition from “absolutely not thinking of quitting” to “thinking about quitting smoking within the next 6 months” occurred among Korean male adults. However, the effect of the tobacco price policy was not substantial and seemed temporary. Intentions to quit smoking remained unchanged among many participants, who continued to smoke despite the increase in tobacco prices. Therefore, to facilitate a transition from the precontemplation stage to the contemplation or preparation stage among adult smokers, the government should continuously increase tobacco prices to a considerable degree and offer targeted tobacco control interventions to specific demographic groups.