• KAFM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

1
results for

"Ju-Seong Park"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Ju-Seong Park"

Original Article
Validation Study of Korean Translated Systemic Clinical Outcome Routine Evaluation-15 as Self-Report Family Assessment Measure: Focusing on Adolescent in Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province
Bo-Kyung Shine, Young-Jin Park, Byung-Wook Ahn, Jaekyoung Bae, Ju-Seong Park, Seong-Ho Han
Korean J Fam Med 2020;41(6):398-403.   Published online May 18, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.19.0076
Background
Systemic Clinic Outcome and Routine Evaluation (SCORE-15) is a compact scale that contains the most critical family function assessment tools including assessments of the strengths, adaptability, and communication among family members. It has been translated into other languages in the United States and Europe. This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of SCORE-15 with a small research population and justify its applicability in Korea.
Methods
SCORE-15 is a self-reporting family function measurement tool for each family member over the age of 11 years. This study used the Family Communication Scale (FCS) included in the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES) IV package and FACES in FACES-III to verify the validity of the Korean-translated SCORE-15. Cronbach’s α value was calculated to check the reliability of SCORE-15. Data were analyzed using STATA ver. 15.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).
Results
The study analyzed the correlation between FACES-III and SCORE-15 and FCS and SCORE-15 so that there was a significant static correlation in both comparisons (r=0.72 and r=0.81, respectively). Also, the research compared each subscale to analyze the correlation and the range was 0.47 to 0.95. The total SCORE-15 Cronbach’s α value was 0.92 and those values of the subscales for family strengths, family communication, and family difficulty were 0.89, 0.73, and 0.87, respectively (P<0.001).
Conclusion
Our study was the first to validate the Korean SCORE-15, which can be used as an appropriate shortform indicator for evaluating family function and changes in detecting therapeutic improvements in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Empowerment among treatment-engaged individuals living with schizophrenia in Tanzania
    Madeline Jin Van Husen, Sylvia Kaaya, Praxeda Swai, Paul Sarea Lawala, Beatrice Thadei, Anna Minja, Jennifer Headley, Joseph R. Egger, Joy Noel Baumgartner
    BMC Psychiatry.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validade Discriminante da Versão Brasileira do SCORE-15: Um Estudo com Amostra Comunitária e Clínica
    Marisa Machado Alves dos Santos Santos, Juliana Maciel de Queiroz, Edna Lúcia Tinoco Ponciano, Margarida Vilaça, Ana Paula Relvas, Luciana Sotero
    Saúde Coletiva (Barueri).2025; 15(95): 15768.     CrossRef
  • The development of a reliable change index and cutoff score for the SCORE‐15
    Richard B. Miller, Cara A. Nebeker‐Adams, Shayne R. Anderson, Angela B. Bradford, Lee N. Johnson
    Journal of Marital and Family Therapy.2023; 49(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Method Bias on the Internal Structure of the Systemic Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Measure of Family Functioning
    Christina Hamme Peterson, N. Andrew Peterson, Corinne Casey
    The Family Journal.2023; 31(3): 498.     CrossRef
  • Children's version of the systemic clinical outcome and routine evaluation (C‐SCORE): Exploring the psychometric qualities in the Portuguese context
    Margarida Vilaça, Bruna Veloso, Peter Stratton, Ana Paula Relvas
    Journal of Family Therapy.2022; 44(4): 550.     CrossRef
  • 5,432 View
  • 83 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
TOP