• KAFM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

3
results for

"Min Jeong Kim"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Min Jeong Kim"

Original Articles
Delphi Survey for Designing a Intervention Research Study on Childhood Obesity Prevention
Min Jeong Kim, Eunju Sung, Eun Young Choi, Young-Su Ju, Eal-Whan Park, Yoo-Seock Cheong, Sunmi Yoo, Kyung Hee Park, Hyung Jin Choi, Seolhye Kim
Korean J Fam Med 2017;38(5):284-290.   Published online September 22, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2017.38.5.284
Background

The prevalence of childhood obesity in South Korea has increased owing to economic improvement and the prevailing Westernized dietary pattern. As the incidence of chronic diseases caused by obesity is also expected to increase, effective interventions to prevent childhood obesity are needed. Therefore, we conducted a Delphi study to determine the priorities of a potential intervention research on childhood obesity prevention and its adequacy and feasibility.

Methods

The two-round Delphi technique was used with a panel of 10 childhood obesity experts. The panelists were asked to rate “priority populations,” “methods of intervention,” “measurement of outcomes,” “future intervention settings,” and “duration of intervention” by using a structured questionnaire. Finally, a portfolio analysis was performed with the adequacy and feasibility indexes as the two axes.

Results

For priority populations, the panel favored “elementary,” “preschool,” and “middle and high school” students in this order. Regarding intervention settings, the panelists assigned high adequacy and feasibility to “childcare centers” and “home” for preschool children, “school” and “home” for elementary school children, and “school” for adolescents in middle and high school. As the age of the target population increased, the panelists scored increasing numbers of anthropometric, clinical, and intermediate outcomes as highly adequate and feasible for assessing the effectiveness of the intervention.

Conclusion

According to the results of the Delphi survey, the highest-priority population for the research on childhood obesity prevention was that of elementary school students. Various settings, methods, outcome measures, and durations for the different age groups were also suggested.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Childhood obesity: The threatening apprentice of the adiposity empire
    J. Karina Zapata, Javier Gómez-Ambrosi, Gema Frühbeck
    Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders.2025; 26(4): 539.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the Impact of Early Childhood Intervention Programs on Obesity Prevention: A comparative study
    Fatima Tariq, Salman Tahir, Shahjahan Raza Gardezi, Maryam Sarwar, Muhammad Nasir Shahbaz, Arham Riaz
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICO-LIFE-SCIENCES.2024; 1(7): 3.     CrossRef
  • Development of a comprehensive flourishing intervention to promote mental health using an e-Delphi technique
    Juliane Piasseschi de Bernardin Gonçalves, Camilla Casaletti Braghetta, Willyane de Andrade Alvarenga, Clarice Gorenstein, Giancarlo Lucchetti, Homero Vallada
    Frontiers in Psychiatry.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development of Physical Activity Competence Test Battery and Evaluation Standards for Korean Children
    Yeon-Oh Han, Byung-Sun Lee
    Children.2022; 9(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Iranian children with overweight and obesity: an internet-based interventional study
    Farnaz Khatami, Ghazal Shariatpanahi, Hamid Barahimi, Rezvan Hashemi, Leila Khedmat, Mahta Gheirati
    BMC Pediatrics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Expert consensus on the important chronic non-specific neck pain motor control and segmental exercise and dosage variables: An international e-Delphi study
    Jonathan Price, Alison Rushton, Vasileios Tyros, Nicola R. Heneghan, Zubing Mei
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(7): e0253523.     CrossRef
  • Designing an internet‐based intervention for improving wellbeing in people with acquired vision loss: A Delphi consensus study
    Nurbanu Somani, Eldre Beukes, Keziah Latham, Gerhard Andersson, Peter M Allen
    Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics.2021; 41(5): 971.     CrossRef
  • Dietary Patterns and Childhood Obesity Risk: A Systematic Review
    Rafaela Liberali, Emil Kupek, Maria Alice Altenburg de Assis
    Childhood Obesity.2020; 16(2): 70.     CrossRef
  • Consensus on the exercise and dosage variables of an exercise training programme for chronic non-specific neck pain: protocol for an international e-Delphi study
    Jonathan Price, Alison Rushton, Vasileios Tyros, Nicola R Heneghan
    BMJ Open.2020; 10(5): e037656.     CrossRef
  • Establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a Delphi panel study
    Shane O’Donnell, Gerardine Doyle, Grace O’Malley, Sarah Browne, James O’Connor, Monica Mars, M-Tahar M. Kechadi
    BMC Public Health.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,630 View
  • 59 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
The Characteristics of the Location of Medical Specialists' Office in Korea.
Sun Kyoung Lee, Eunseong Cho, Min Jeong Kim, Jeong Eun Kim, Sun Eun Kim, Su Jong Hyun
Korean J Fam Med 2009;30(4):292-300.   Published online April 20, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2009.30.4.292
Background
While a great amount of practical attention has been paid to the location of medical specialists' office, little research has been published in Korean medical journals. This study examines the concentration level and the related factors of the location of medical specialists' offi ce. For the related factors of the location, this study considers 1) the relative infl uence of resident vs. daytime population, 2) the relative infl uence of resident vs. university-graduate population, and 3) the ratio of aged population. Methods: This study utilized the Korea Medical Association's "2006 Annual Report Membership Statistics" and the Korea National Statistical Offi ce's "2005 National Population and Housing Census" as data sources. Results: The location of plastic surgeons, dermatologists, psychiatrists, ophthalmologists, and urologists' offi ce was more concentrated than the average, while the reverse was true for obstetricians, gynecologists, orthopedic surgeons, internists, family physicians, and general surgeon's offi ce. Daytime population was more correlated with the location of doctors' office than resident population in most specialties, with the exception of pediatrics, orthopedic surgery and internal medicine. While university-graduates population was more associated with the location than resident population in most specialties, the reverse was true for orthopedic surgery, obstetrics & gynecology, and pediatrics. The ratio of aged population was negatively associated with the location in all the specialties. Conclusion: The concentration level showed considerable differences across specialties. Daytime population and university-graduate population were more related with the location of doctors' offi ce than resident population in most specialties.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Equitable City in an Aging Society: Public Transportation-Based Primary Care Accessibility in Seoul, Korea
    Yoonchae Yoon, Jina Park
    Sustainability.2022; 14(16): 9902.     CrossRef
  • 2,403 View
  • 16 Download
  • 1 Crossref
The Current Educational Measurement of Family Practice Residents.
Min Jeong Kim, Ho Cheol Shin, Cheol Hawn Kim, Youn Seon Choi, Hang Lee, Ae Kyung Choi, Yu Jin Paek, Eon Sook Lee, Jin Ho Park, Yoon Jung Chang
J Korean Acad Fam Med 2007;28(8):616-625.   Published online August 10, 2007
Background
The educational assessment of residents is very important in order to check their knowledge and to improve their ability. In case of family practice, the residents spend most of their training time in outside rotations with other specialities. Therefore, they are requested to be evaluated by each specialist after each rotation. To give more accurate assessment, we surveyed directly our family practice residents and family practice faculties. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to family practice residents and family practice faculties in 116 hospitals from May to June 2006. The response rate was 29% and 78%, respectively. Results: Among the total, 70.2% of family practice residents thought an assessment is necessary, but only 51.7% were evaluated. Overall, 90.4% of family practice faculties knew about the assessment of residents made by other specialists, and only 56.7% of faculties requested other specialists to assess their family practice residents. Conclusion: Most of the family practice residents and their faculties knew the need for assessment, but they complained there were no objectivity and the assessment tool was lacking. In order to solve this problem, it is urgent to develop a unified form and guidelines of assesment. (J Korean Acad Fam Med 2007;28:616-625)
  • 1,641 View
  • 14 Download
TOP