Background This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of and determine the factors associated with antihypertensive medication (A-HTNM) non-adherence among hypertension care seekers attending primary health clinics in the Gaza Strip.
Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted as the recruitment phase of a clustered randomized controlled trial including 538 participants. The participants were randomly selected from 10 primary health care centers by two-stage cluster random sampling. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data through face-to-face interview. The questionnaire was developed based on the World Health Organization determinants for medication non-adherence and the Health Belief Model. The main outcomes of this study were the prevalences of A-HTNM non-adherence and its associated factors. Adherence status was assessed using the eight-item Morisky Self-Report Medication Adherence Scale. Data were analyzed by STATA ver. 14.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA) using a standard complex survey, accounting for unresponsiveness and the clustering sampling approach.
Results The overall prevalence of A-HTNM non-adherence was 65.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.2–71.8). Among all studied predictors, only self-efficacy of participants (odds ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% CI, 1.79–2.84) and social support (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 2.82–5.11) remained significantly associated with A-HTNM non-adherence after adjusting for age, education level, number and frequency of A-HTNM doses per day, and comorbidities.
Conclusion The high prevalence of non-adherence highlights the need for serious intervention to enhance the adherence rate among hypertension patients. The associated factors can be considered when developing appropriate interventions.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Adherence to hypertension management at a rural hospital in Limpopo: A cross-sectional study Murendeni F. Sikhau, Mbuyisa J. Makhubu, Gert J.O. Marincowitz, Clara Marincowitz South African Family Practice.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
ADHERENCE TO ANTIHYPERTENSIVE MEDICATION AND ITS DETERMINANTS IN A PRIMARY CARE SETTING OF KALABURAGI DISTRICT GEETHANJALI P, POONAM P SHINGADE, AMRUTA SWATI I, PRASHANT KUMAR Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research.2024; : 15. CrossRef
Prevalence of hypertension and its associated factors among healthcare workers in the Gaza Strip, Palestine: a cross-sectional study Joma Younis, Lina Wang, Kejing Zhang, Majed Jebril, Hong Jiang, Yahui Fan, Zhaofang Li, Mei Ma, Le Ma, Zhaozhao Hui, Mao Ma, Wei Zhang BMJ Open.2024; 14(12): e076577. CrossRef
Blood Pressure Control and Its Determinants among Patients with Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease in Myanmar Ei Su Mon, Aurawamon Sriyuktasuth, Warunee Phligbua Nurse Media Journal of Nursing.2022; 12(1): 1. CrossRef
Medication Adherence and Effective Management of Hypertension Seung-Won Oh Korean Journal of Family Medicine.2021; 42(2): 89. CrossRef
Background : Doctor shopping is common in Korea. Therefore, if patients are not familiar with the name of the antihypertensive drug they are taking, they may end up taking a drug that previously caused them side effects and may have to start on a new antihypertensive drug. This study was to clarify the factors related to patients' recognition of the name of their antihypertensive medications.
Methods : A questionnaire survey was done in June 2002 targeting 607 outpatients who were on antihypertensive medication seeking care at Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University Hospital and a clinic in Gyungju. Out of the 607 patients, 293 patients responded to the questionnaire.
Results : Ninety six of the 293 patients (32.8%) were able to accurately name at least one of the antihypertensive drugs they were taking. Women were more familiar with names of antihypertensive drugs than men (39.4% vs 23.6%, odds ratio [O.R], 2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39∼5.22). The recognition of a drug was greater in subjects who had a higher education level (high school or university) compared to those with a lower education level (elementary school or less) by 4.2 fold (O.R, 4.20; CI, 1.64∼10.69). The type of concomitant drug intake was lower in subjects who could name their antihypertensive drugs than for subjects who could not (O.R, 0.78; CI, 0.63∼0.98). The patients who could name their antihypertensive drugs had both a lower mean systolic (133.2±11.6 mmHg: mean±standard deviation [S.D] vs 141.3±15.5 mmHg: mean±S.D) and diastolic blood pressure, compared to the patients who could not (84.5±7.2 mmHg: mean±S.D vs 86.8±9.5 mmHg: mean±S.D) when measured twice consecutively during a recent clinic visit.
Conclusion : The recognition of a medication was associated with patient's sex, education level and the number of concomitant drug intake. The patients, who could name the antihypertensive drugs they were taking, had a lower mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure.