• KAFM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

2
results for

"Secondhand Smoke"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

Funded articles

"Secondhand Smoke"

Original Articles
Background
Similar to smoking, exposure to secondhand smoke is a risk factor for developing hypertension and cardiovascular diseases; however, there is no standardized method for measuring smoke exposure. Measuring urine cotinine levels is one possible means for determining the degree of exposure to secondhand smoke. This study investigated the association between urinary cotinine levels and blood pressure in Korean adults exposed to secondhand smoke.
Methods
Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted between 2016 and 2018 were used. A total of 9,273 participants aged ≥19 years self-reported as current non-smokers, which was cotinine- verified. A complex sample general linear model regression analysis was performed to analyze the association between urine cotinine and blood pressure. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Corrected urine cotinine levels were positively associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure in female participants (P<0.001 and P=0.040, respectively). Furthermore, a 10-fold increase in the corrected urine cotinine level of those in contact with secondhand smoke was independently associated with 2.085 mm Hg and 0.575 mm Hg increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. However, there was no association between systolic and diastolic blood pressure in male participants (P=0.226 and P=0.256, respectively).
Conclusion
Urinary cotinine levels were positively associated with increased blood pressure in females exposed to secondhand smoke. Therefore, urinary cotinine may be used as an indicator to quantify and monitor the effects of blood pressure elevation in females exposed to secondhand smoke.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Association between the urine tobacco metabolite levels and physical health in Chinese primary school students with secondhand smoke exposure
    Menghan Cheng, Miao Zhang, Wen Fang, Hong Qin, Yue Pan, Shengyi Chen, Guiqi Cao, Yao Zhang, Yu Lu
    Frontiers in Public Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of smoking exposure by urine cotinine levels in severe COVID-19 patients: a case-control study
    Medeni Arpa, Bayram Şen, Leyla Kazancıoğlu, Hülya Kılıç
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,397 View
  • 170 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Exposure to Secondhand Smoke and a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen in Non-Smokers
Jae-woo Lee, Woojung Yang, Ye-Seul Kim, Yonghwan Kim, Hyo-Sun Yoo, Hee-Taik Kang
Korean J Fam Med 2022;43(2):117-124.   Published online March 17, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.21.0073
Background
The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) as a known carcinogen. This study aimed to investigate the association between exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) and NNAL concentrations in non-smokers.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study based on data from the 2016 to 2018 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Urine NNAL concentrations were categorized into tertiles of 3,615 study participants who were non-smokers. All sampling and weight variables were stratified, and analyses to account for the complex sampling design were conducted.
Results
The overall, male, and female percentages of SHS exposure among non-smokers were 22.4%, 29.2%, and 20.4%, respectively. The geometric means of urine NNAL concentrations were 1.896±0.098 pg/mL and 1.094±0.028 pg/mL in the SHS exposure and non-exposure groups, respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables, in the total group, the geometric mean of urine NNAL concentrations was significantly higher in the SHS exposure group than in the SHS non-exposure group (adjusted P-value <0.001). Compared with the non-exposure group, the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the highest NNAL tertile group of overall SHS exposure in the total, men, and women groups were 2.44 (1.95–3.05), 1.65 (1.08–2.53), and 2.73 (2.11–3.52), respectively, after full adjustment.
Conclusion
The urine NNAL concentration in the SHS exposure group was significantly higher than that in the non-exposure group. Exposure to SHS was associated with a higher risk of elevated urine NNAL concentrations in non-smokers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Differences in biomarkers of potential harm after 2+ years of tobacco heating system use compared to cigarette smoking: a cross-sectional study
    S. Michael Ansari, Patrice Leroy, Guillaume de La Bourdonnaye, Sandrine Pouly, Lindsay Reese, Christelle Haziza
    Biomarkers.2025; 30(2): 178.     CrossRef
  • Secondhand smoke exposure at home in a representative sample of adults in Poland in 2024: A cross-sectional survey
    Mateusz Jankowski
    European Journal of Health Policy, Humanization of Care and Medical Ethics.2025; 4(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • High throughput and sensitive quantitation of tobacco-specific alkaloids and nitrosamines in wastewater
    Zhe Wang, Qiuda Zheng, Benjamin J. Tscharke, Jinglong Li, Jake W. O'Brien, Brad Patterson, Zeyang Zhao, Kevin V. Thomas, Jochen F. Mueller, Phong K. Thai
    Talanta.2024; 277: 126401.     CrossRef
  • Association Between Second-Hand Smoke Exposure and Respiratory Symptoms Among the General Population of Non-smoker Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Mohammed Madkhali, Safa Shariff, Raghad Albalawi, Abdulrahman Aqeel, Abdulqader Alshahrani, Raghd Alabdullah, Raghad Alasmari, Wajd Aljohani
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Short-Term Effects of Side-Stream Smoke on Nerve Growth Factor and Its Receptors TrKA and p75NTR in a Group of Non-Smokers
    Anna Maria Stabile, Alessandra Pistilli, Desirée Bartolini, Eleonora Angelucci, Marco Dell’Omo, Gabriele Di Sante, Mario Rende
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(16): 10317.     CrossRef
  • 7,438 View
  • 137 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
TOP