Background: Appetite control and weight reduction is important for the treatment of chronic disease such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Visual analogue scales (VAS) is widely used to assess appetite. We investigated the reproducibility and the validity of the Korean version of VAS for appetite which will be helpful for clinical use. Methods: The subjects received the same test meal and 8 VAS questionnaires between 6 weeks. They started to fill out the questionnaire before lunch, continued after lunch every hour, and ended after dinner. The questionnaire was asked about hunger, satiety, fullness, prospective consumption, sweet, salty, savoury, and fatty. During the test meal, the subjects could eat ad libitum until 'comfortable satisfaction'; and after the test meal we calculated energy intake. We assessed the correlation between test-retest VAS for each appetite and evaluated the validity of VAS for hunger with energy intake as "gold-standard". Results: The VAS curves of each appetite were similar between the test and the retest. The VAS of each appetite on the test day was strongly correlated with that on the retest day. The CRs of 4.5 hour mean VAS (20∼34 mm) was smaller than the CRs of fasting VAS (35∼54 mm). The correlation coefficient of Hunger VAS before dinner and the energy intake was 0.436 on the test day and 0.400 on the retest day. The VAS of the sweet was correlated to the total glucose intake (P＜0.05), and the VAS of salty to the salt intake. Conclusion: The validity of the VAS score for appetite, especially hunger, sweet and salty taste was good. Indeed, the reliability of VAS for appetite was good to use this scale in a clinical setting. (J Korean Acad Fam Med 2008;29:736-745)
Background : Symptoms of musculoskeletal system is a common problem, followed by those of respiratory system. Most patients with problems of musculoskeletal system are examined and treated by a primary doctor. This research was performed to inquire into a method which can increase the effectiveness and the precision of history taking in patients with problems of musculoskeletal system in primary care and also to assess a self-marking method were patients can mark their pain site on a normalized picture.
Methods : In the department of family medicine and rehabilitation of an university hospital in Seoul, 44 patients with musculoskeletal pain on their first visit in an outpatient clinic were asked to put marks on a normalized picture and also mark the degree of pain with a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, before history taking. After history taking, the doctor also marked the spot of the patient's pain on the normalized picture and then compared the spots together. After comparing the two pictures of the doctor's and the patients', they then drew another picture with only one spot to avoid overlapping spots. We compared the differences among the patients in every decade from ages 20 to 60 and divided the value of visual analog scale into 3 groups concerning the spots drawn by patients, and compared the relations between them.
Results : The pain spots drawn by doctor only were on the lumbar spine and the shoulder whereas most of pain spots drawn by patients only were on the upper back, the cervical spine, and the lumbar spin. The older the patient and the lower the degree of pain was, the more humerous it had spots.
Conclusion : It is considered that with a general history taking method and a self-marking method, clinical effectiveness will be great to the patients having pain on the abdomen, the cervical spine, and the lumbar spine and to those who are elderly and with lower pain spots.
First
Prev
