Background Nowadays 2-year 'Compulsory Clinical Training Program' is on issue. The perception and opinions for the new training system of residents and interns may be essential to establish ideal postgraduate medical education. Methods: A questionnaire survey of postgraduate trainee from March to April 2008 was performed by person to person method. Gender, age, specialty, the location and the facility of the hospital, and 7 questions reflecting individual perception and opinions for the 'Compulsory Clinical Training Program' were reviewed. Results: Among in 1,314, 1,284 subjects completed the survey fully. We divided 1,284 sujects into 4 groups; Intern; Resident of Family Medicine; Resident of Internal Medicine or Pediatrics; Resident of other than Family Medicine, Internal Medicine and Pediatrics. About the vision for independent clinical skills through the 'Compulsory Clinical Training Program', most were negative. They were afraid of 'prolongation of current Internship' or 'unclear quality of the training course'. In case of setting the 'Compulsory Clinical Training Program', most chose additional resident courses for specialty. The main opinion about the ideal model of a primary physician was medical doctors who obtained primary care specialty. Conclusion: Most of the residents and interns think that the specialists of family medicine, internal medicine or pediatrics are suitable for primary care. And on wishing the additional residency course even after 'Compulsory Clinical Training Program', they doubt about the effi cacy of the new training system.
Background: With the number of geriatric population on a steep increase, the roles of family physicians broaden to give comprehensive medical care to the elderly. Therefore, geriatrics is becoming increasingly more important for the residents of family medicine. The authors have surveyed and researched on resident's current attention, actual training conditions, and future needs on geriatrics. Methods: Family medicine residents in 79 hospitals registered to Korean Family Medicine Resident Union were enrolled. By means of electronic and postage mail surveys, informations were gathered; including demographics, the order of importance of nine training curricula, the necessity of training itself, the facility and academic conference of geriatrics training. Results: A total of 173 residents in 45 hospitals replied with return rates of 51.9%. Among the total, 169 (97.7%) of the answered agreed on the necessity of geriatrics training. Of the nine curricula, geriatrics was considered the most important. And residents considered family medicine outpatient department and inpatient ward to be the most important place for geriatrics training. Furthermore, the residents considered elderly's diseases or symptoms as more important conference title, but the parameters such as the quality of life, physiology of aging, care in nursing home were considered less important. Conclusion: The geriatrics training program is not up to the standards of residents' satisfaction. This is considered to be due to the absence of a formal training program. To provide a better care for the elderly, it is compulsory to gain broad knowledge of geriatrics and actual experience out in the field. (J Korean Acad Fam Med 2008;29:687-694)
Background : Most recently, there is an increased use of EGD (esophagogastroduodenoscopy) for primary care among family physicians, which tends to promote EGD training programs in the course of Family Practice Residency. This study determined to survey current status of EGD training programs among residents in family medicine, identify relevant problems, and present some suggestions for their improvement.
Methods : The subjects were residents selected among family medicine training hospitals, which were registered in the KAFM (Korean Academy of Family Medicine). The residents were in their 3rd year of training or had already completed the EGD training program. Surveys were sent out to those hospitals by mail and electronic mail surveys were performed by researchers.
Results : Among 66 subject hospitals a total of 27 surveys (40.9%) were returned. Most EGD training were performed in the department of internal medicine. The mean duration of training period was 8 weeks. The averale number of hands on experience of the procedure was 62. It was found that most residents thought that EGD training period and the number of hands on experience of the procedure were insufficient. The longer period of actual experience of the procedure and the more number of EGD caseloads they had, the more they were satisfied with their EGD training programs. It was also found that there was a high demand for a follow-up learning opportunities for EGD (p＜.05), because the residents who had already had many EGD caseloads further wanted to receive continuous education even, after they acquired license. There were no relationships observation period, period of actual experience of the procedure, and number of EGD caseloads during residency with demand for follow-up learning opportunities.
Conclusion : In summary, there was insufficient EGD training period and actual experience of the EGD procedure in family practice residency. There was low satisfaction of EGD training programs and high demand for continuous education. Therefore, it is recommended to establish EGD training program, proper practice training, and regular continuing education after completing residency.
First
Prev
