• KAFM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Articles

Letter

Importance of Opportunistic Health-Checks among Lower Socioeconomic Groups

Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2019;40(3):199-200.
Published online: May 9, 2019

GKT School of Medical Education, King’s College London, London, UK

*Corresponding Author: Hyun S. Lee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8425-0706 Tel: +44-7784634949, E-mail: Lhyun_seok.lee@kcl.ac.uk
• Received: July 11, 2018   • Accepted: July 19, 2018

Copyright © 2019 The Korean Academy of Family Medicine

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 3,876 Views
  • 72 Download
prev
Dear Editor,
I was fascinated by an article of Shin et al. [1] published in the March issue. As a Korean national studying medicine in the United Kingdom, I noticed that the authors’ use of the National Health Service’s (NHS) Health Check Program as a reference point was misplaced. Korea’s current health check-up and screening programs are far more thorough than those of the NHS Health Check Program, which is implemented just once every 5 years and the laboratory tests are limited to cholesterol and hemoglobin A1c levels [2]. Most NHS preventive measures are opportunistic, which is an area where Korea could improve.
Unlike Korea’s quasi-public healthcare system, the United Kingdom operates on a single-payer system in which patients have no costs other than through taxation. All NHS patients are registered with general practitioners and allocated to dedicated general practitioners who are remunerated via a complex system of base fees per patient and outcome-based incentives, which are set forth in the Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) [3]. Example incentives are annual asthma checkups and blood pressure monitoring of diabetic patients. To earn the maximum possible income, practitioners proactively seek patients for check-ups, usually using nurses.
Korea’s current primary care system encourages as many patient encounters as possible because remuneration primarily is on a per patient visit basis. Therefore, clinicians have little incentive to thoroughly read individual patients’ histories or perform opportunistic reviews of chronic conditions outside the purposes of the visit. This differs from the United Kingdom, where digital patient records actively alert clinicians of outstanding items in the QOF, which fully exploits a consultation’s opportunities. For example, a chronic asthma patient seeking care for something unrelated to asthma would obtain an asthma review. Health outcomes are thereby improved.
This is a highly relevant approach from the perspective of healthcare service use among people of relatively low socioeconomic status because they tend to seek care less often,4) usually because of financial or other personal constraints. Rather than trying to improve national screening programs to improve healthcare for these patients, a better approach might be to increase their access to opportunistic health check-ups during scheduled visits. This approach would improve health outcomes better than public information campaigns targeting lower socioeconomic groups, and it would function well given the lack of continuity in the Korean primary care system.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • 1. Shin HY, Kang HT, Lee JW, Lim HJ. The association between socioeconomic status and adherence to health check-up in Korean adults, based on the 2010-2012 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Korean J Fam Med 2018;39:114-21.
  • 2. Public Health England. NHS health check: best practice guidance. London: Public Health England; 2017.
  • 3. The King’s Fund. Commissioning and funding general practice: making the case for family care networks [Internet]. London: The King’s Fund; 2014 [cited 2018 Jun 20]. Available from: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/commissioning-and-funding-general-practice
  • 4. Filc D, Davidovich N, Novack L, Balicer RD. Is socioeconomic status associated with utilization of health care services in a single-payer universal health care system? Int J Equity Health 2014;13:115.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Download Citation

      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:

      Include:

      Importance of Opportunistic Health-Checks among Lower Socioeconomic Groups
      Korean J Fam Med. 2019;40(3):199-200.   Published online May 9, 2019
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Importance of Opportunistic Health-Checks among Lower Socioeconomic Groups
      Korean J Fam Med. 2019;40(3):199-200.   Published online May 9, 2019
      Close
      Importance of Opportunistic Health-Checks among Lower Socioeconomic Groups
      Importance of Opportunistic Health-Checks among Lower Socioeconomic Groups
      TOP