INTRODUCTION
Fear of falling (FOF) is defined as an excessive concern about falling or the belief that one cannot prevent a fall. Many older individuals, both fallers and non-fallers, suffer from a variety of adverse psychosocial difficulties related to falling, including fear, anxiety, loss of confidence and impaired self-efficacy resulting in activity avoidance, social isolation, and increasing frailty [
1-
6]. FOF is a common and disabling problem in older individuals and was reported in 3%–85% of community-dwelling elders who have fallen and up to 50% of those who have never fallen [
1,
2,
5,
6].
The prevalence of FOF and consequent adverse effects differ in studies. In a study of over 1,000 community-dwelling women aged 70 to 85 years, FOF, as determined by a questionnaire, was found in one-third of women at baseline and affected 46% of the sample during the 3-year follow-up [
1]. In a study of 673 community-dwelling older adults, 60% reported moderate restriction of activity and 15% severe restriction of activity due to FOF [
7]. A systematic review found that FOF may affect 50% or more of patients following hip fracture [
8].
Many cross-sectional studies have focused on the risk factors of FOF [
9]. Previous studies have shown that old age, female sex, a history of previous falls, decreased cognitive function, impaired physical performance, depressive disorders, and chronic illness were associated with FOF [
1,
5,
10-
13]. It has also been associated with restriction in activity, decreased life satisfaction, and frailty [
5,
7,
12]. A number of previous studies have used a cross-sectional design to evaluate the associated factors of FOF. Although there have been several follow-up studies, the focus is limited to changes in daily activities, functional abilities, and quality of life caused by FOF [
1,
7,
10,
11]. However, the impact of FOF on mortality has not been extensively studied, because a large population sample and the changes to it over time are required to investigate the relationship between FOF and mortality. Therefore, the aim of this longitudinal prospective study was to investigate the impact of FOF on mortality among community-dwelling older adults using the database of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA).
RESULTS
The baseline characteristics of the study participants by sex are presented in
Table 1. FOF was significantly higher in women for both mild FOF (n=993, 51.2%) and moderate FOF (n=564, 29.0%). Among the participants, 43.1% were men, and 56.9% were women. The mean age was 71.5±0.1 years for men and 72.6±0.1 years for women (P<0.001). The median body mass index was 23.1±0.1 kg/m
2, and there were no significant differences between men and women with respect to BMI. However, obesity (BMI ≥25.0 kg/m
2) rate was significantly higher in women (23.1%) than in men (17.4%) (P<0.001). Hypertension was found in 40.0% of the patients; diabetes, 16.0%, established cardiovascular disease, 7.4%; and established stroke, 3.8%. Stroke and chronic lung disease were significantly higher in men, and hypertension was significantly higher in women. However, there were no statistically significant differences in other medical conditions. The mean K-MMSE score (25.4±0.1, P<0.001), handgrip strength (28.2±0.2, P<0.001), the smoking and drinking rate of men was significantly higher than that of women. The rate of depression diagnosed based on CES-D10 was significantly higher in women (P<0.001). Of the participants, 2,338 (68.3%) had a FOF and 207 (6.0%) had had an incident of falling in the previous 2 years.
For the 3,421 subjects, during the follow-up period of approximately 8 years, the prevalence of all-cause mortality was 20.6% (705 participants: 388 men and 317 women). The mortality rate in men (26.3%) was higher than that in women (16.3%).
A significant association between FOF and mortality is shown in
Table 2. After adjustment for age, sex, history of falling, smoking status, BMI, physical activity, alcohol consumption, handgrip strength, depression, diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease, chronic liver disease, cardiovascular disease, and stroke, the hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality for individuals with mild and moderate degrees of FOF were 1.25 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01−1.54) and 1.59 times (95% CI, 1.23−2.05) that for those without FOF, respectively. After stratification by sex, both mild and moderate FOF groups had an increased mortality risk, but the mild FOF group was not statistically significant (male: HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.96–1.60; female: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.92–2.07).
Figure 1 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for these three groupings of FOF. The survival rate decreased with time in the group with FOF compared to the group without FOF.
Figure 2 shows the results of the subgroup analysis and is displayed in a schematic form as a forest plot. The mortality risk of the FOF group compared with the no FOF group was presented with the HR and 95% CI in each subgroup. The association between FOF and mortality was consistent in subgroups defined according to age, sex, history of falling, smoking status, BMI, diagnosis of hypertension, and diabetes. FOF was a significant risk factor of mortality for patients without a previous history of falling after adjusting for other risk factors, as in the full model, except for history of falling (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.27−2.13). In the group of patients who had previously experienced a fall, FOF had an increased risk of mortality, but was not statistically significant (HR, 3.80; 95% CI, 0.22−14.80). The hazard ratio was also higher in groups with obesity (BMI ≥25.0 kg/m
2), but this was not statistically significant (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.59−2.42). In the group diagnosed with depression based on CES-D10, FOF increased the risk of mortality, but this was not statistically significant (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.96−2.03). The HRs for those diagnosed with stroke and cardiovascular disease were 1.10 (95% CI, 0.30−3.17) and 1.56 (95% CI, 0.62−3.95), respectively, but were not statistically significant. In the groups with MMSE <23 and ≥23, the HRs were 1.49 (95% CI, 0.98−2.27) and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.11–2.20), respectively, and the former was not statistically significant.
DISCUSSION
In our study, FOF was a significant risk factor for mortality during the 8-year follow-up period in Korean elderly patients, and the mortality rate increased with the degree of FOF. In addition, subgroup analysis showed that these results were consistent in people who have not experienced previous falls.
FOF was recognized in the 1980s as a major health problem among older adults. Initially, FOF was considered as a post-fall syndrome, named ptophobia; however, subsequent studies found that FOF could also be identified in older adults, even those who have not experienced falls [
1,
2,
11,
18,
19]. It has been reported that FOF results in several adverse consequences, including activity restriction, reduced social interactions, and a poor quality of life. It also results in further physical, psychological, mental, and social functional declines [
2,
10,
20,
21].
Anxiety disorders have been associated with a significantly increased mortality risk, and the co-occurrence of mood and anxiety disorders results in an additional increased risk of death [
22]. A recent meta-analysis indicated that approximately 5 million deaths worldwide are attributable to mood and anxiety disorders each year [
23]. FOF is one of the phobic anxieties defined as excessive fear of falls, and phobic anxieties have been associated with cardiac mortality. A recent published meta-analysis reported that anxiety was associated with a 52% increase in the incidence of cardiovascular disease [
24]. However, little is known about the mechanisms by which anxiety increases cardiovascular disease-associated mortality, but it is known that depression can increase cardiovascular disease-associated mortality by autonomic nervous system dysfunction, platelet dysfunction, and inflammatory mediators [
25]. Some of these mechanisms have been used to explain the anxiety- and cardiovascular disease-associated mortality. However, further study is needed on the mechanism that FOF that contributes to mortality rate directly rather than as a confounding factor.
Restriction of physical activity and decline in physical function due to FOF could have an impact on mortality. Physical activity has been extensively studied because of its well-known effects on metabolic syndrome, insulin sensitivity, cardiovascular disease risk, and allcause mortality [
26]. A study on the effects of physical activity on cardiovascular disease shows a correlation between physical activity and triglyceride, apolipoprotein B, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein particle size, tissue plasminogen activity, and coronary artery calcium score. This suggests that cardiovascular mortality may be higher in patients with impaired physical activity due to FOF.
Moreover, FOF could be a result of the deterioration of physical function, such as muscle weakness, which is an indicator of frailty. Frailty is a prevalent and important geriatric syndrome associated with decreased survival [
27]. The geriatric assessment of frailty provides clinically important information about functional status and survival of older adults. Age, number of chronic diseases, depressive mood, MMSE, falls, hospitalization, instrumental activity of daily living disability all contributed to frailty [
28]. A person with a FOF is more likely to be an elderly person with a frailty, and such an elderly person may have a higher risk of mortality. We assume that FOF can also be a tool for geriatric assessment of frailty, but further research is needed.
There has been a previous study of FOF and its association with mortality in the Shih-Pai area in Taiwan [
29]. This 7-year follow-up longitudinal study comprised of 3,814 older adults aged 65 years and older who were living in the Shih-Pai area in Taiwan. In this study, FOF was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02–1.33) after adjusting for multiple variables, and this is consistent with the results of our study. However, the study was conducted only with participants from a single community in Taiwan, unlike our study, which covered the entire geographical area of Korea. In addition, the Taiwan study did not evaluate the FOF according to degree, so it could not analyze the association between the degree of FOF and mortality.
Nevertheless, several limitations should be considered in interpreting the results of our study. First, the percentage of people with FOF was overestimated compared with previous studies. FOF has been reported to occur in about 30% to 65% of community-dwelling older adults aged >60 years, according to previous studies [
2,
5]. In the literature, the prevalence of FOF has been consistently higher among women than among men [
2,
5,
10]; however, it reached 80% in women and 50% in men in this study. This may have been because FOF was categorized by degree (none, mild, or moderate) instead of presence or absence.
Second, there was a selection bias due to loss at follow-up and unknown dates of death. We tried to reduce the selection bias, but we could not eliminate it entirely, because the bias was introduced by the sample collection process.
Third, there were differences in baseline characteristics between men and women. Because of these differences, the results with respect to mortality were different between men and women, showing different results in the subgroup analysis.
Fourth, in a group of participants who had previously experienced a fall, FOF had an increased risk of mortality, but this not statistically significant. This is because the percentage of participants who had previously experienced a fall was only 6%, so caution is needed in interpreting this result.
Furthermore, we did not perform cause-specific mortality analyses. The causes of death were collected at each time from the family or dwellers after death of participants and not by the Cause of Death Registry. For this reason, deaths from diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, or death from external causes were not all exactly evaluated.
Despite these limitations, our study has several strengths. First, KLoSA is a nationwide survey with a sample of 10,254 subjects in 2006, and 80% participated until 2014. The large sample size and 8-year follow-up contributed significantly towards elucidating the relationship between FOF and mortality in the elderly.
We were able to demonstrate a relationship between mortality and the degree of FOF. Previous studies classified FOF into two categories, by either presence or absence of FOF, whereas this study classified it into three categories according to degree (none, mild, and moderate). As a result, we were able to demonstrate a linear relationship of FOF and mortality according to its degree of FOF. The higher the degree of FOF, the higher the mortality, which further demonstrated that FOF is a significant risk factor for mortality in the elderly.
This study showed that FOF is a significant risk factor for mortality in Korean elderly. However, further studies are needed to determine the mechanism by which FOF increases mortality.