• KAFM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Articles

Commentary

Comments on Statistical Issues in May 2013

Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2013;34(3):224-225.
Published online: May 24, 2013

Department of Biostatistics, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Copyright © 2013 The Korean Academy of Family Medicine

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 2,997 Views
  • 16 Download
prev next
In this section, we explain the analysis data sets obtained from clinical trials; in the article titled, "Effect of Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 on overweight and obese adults: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial", published in March 2013 by Jung et al.1)
The following is from the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guideline E9,2) "Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials", concerning the analysis data sets obtained from clinical trials. Decisions concerning the analysis set should be guided by the following principles: 1) to minimize bias and 2) to avoid inflation of type I error.
1. Full Analysis Set
The intention-to-treat principle implies that the primary analysis should include all randomized subjects. Compliance with this principle would necessitate complete follow-up of all randomized subjects for study outcomes. In this document the term 'full analysis set' is used to describe the analysis set which is as complete as possible and as close as possible to the intention-to-treat ideal of including all randomized subjects. Preservation of the initial randomization in analysis is important in preventing bias and in providing a secure foundation for statistical tests.
There are a limited number of circumstances that might lead to exclude randomized subjects from the full analysis set, including the failure to satisfy major entry criteria (eligibility violations), the failure to take at least one dose of trial medication and the lack of any data post randomization. Such exclusions should always be justified.
Subjects who fail to satisfy an entry criterion may be excluded from the analysis without the possibility of introducing bias only under the following circumstances: 1) the entry criterion was measured prior to randomization; 2) the detection of the relevant eligibility violations can be made completely objectively; 3) all subjects receive equal scrutiny for eligibility violations (This may be difficult to ensure in an open-label study, or even in a double-blind study if the data are un-blinded prior to this scrutiny, emphasizing the importance of the blind review.); 4) all detected violations of the particular entry criterion are excluded.
2. Per Protocol Set
The 'per protocol' set of subjects, sometimes described as the 'valid cases', the 'efficacy' sample or the 'evaluable subjects' sample, defines a subset of the subjects in the full analysis set who are more compliant with the protocol and is characterized by criteria such as the following: 1) the completion of a certain pre-specified minimal exposure to the treatment regimen; 2) the availability of measurements of the primary variable(s); 3) the absence of any major protocol violations including the violation of entry criteria.
3. Safety Set
For the overall safety assessment, the set of subjects to be summarized is usually defined as those subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational drug.
From the definitions of the three analysis data sets above, we can presuppose that, in most cases, the full analysis set has the largest number of observations, followed by the safety set, and the per-protocol set has the smallest amount of data.
When the full analysis set is used, we usually replace the missing measurements which occurred in the subjects withdrawn after receiving one or more doses, with some conservative values as follows: 1) regard as a failure when the outcome is measured as success or failure; 2) use the value from the carrying forward of the last observation for continuous variables.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • 1. Jung SP, Lee KM, Kang JH, Yun SI, Park HO, Moon Y, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 on overweight and obese adults: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Korean J Fam Med 2013;34:80-89. PMID: 23560206.
  • 2. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). ICH guideline E9: statistical principles for clinical trials [Internet]. Geneva: International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; 1998. [cited 2013 May 11]. Available from: http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/efficacy/article/efficacy-guidelines.html

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Download Citation

      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:

      Include:

      Comments on Statistical Issues in May 2013
      Korean J Fam Med. 2013;34(3):224-225.   Published online May 24, 2013
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Comments on Statistical Issues in May 2013
      Korean J Fam Med. 2013;34(3):224-225.   Published online May 24, 2013
      Close
      Comments on Statistical Issues in May 2013
      Comments on Statistical Issues in May 2013
      TOP